A has committed criminal breach of trust. Nor is it necessary that the taking or enticing must be shown to have been by means of force or fraud. Here A is guilty of the offence defined in the later part of this section. A, knowing that Z is labouring under such a disease that a blow is likely to cause his death, strikes him with the intention of causing bodily injury. Right of private defence against the act of a person of unsound mind, etc.
It comes from the maxim that no person can be punished in a proceeding of criminal nature unless it can be showed that he had a guiltymind. The wife told the accused about this program even though she knew that the accused was waiting for the opportunity to kill her husband and taking the opportunity he killed him. When theft is robbery: Before theft can amount to robbery,— Firstly: The offender must have voluntarily caused or attempted to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint or fear of instant death or of instant hurt or of instant wrongful restraint, Secondly: This must be in order to the committing of theft, or in committing of theft, or in carrying away or attempting to carry away property obtained by the theft, Thirdly: The offender must voluntarily cause or attempt to cause to any person hurt, etc. Sale of counterfeit Government stamp. Fouling water of public spring or reservoir.
The main difference between robbery and dacoity is the number of participants in the crime. Act not intended and not known to be likely to cause death or grievous hurt, done by consent. Section 396 in The Indian Penal Code — Dacoity with murder. The right of private defence of property against house-breaking by night continues as long as the house-trespass which has been begun by such house-breaking continues. Extortion by putting a person in fear of death or grievous hurt.
But, if A sells the horse and appropriates the whole proceeds to his own use, he is guilty of an offence under this section. A is dismissed from his office, and B succeeds him. Co-operation by doing one of several acts constituting an offence. A is guilty of abetting murder. The offence under this Section 393 is cognizable, non-bailable, non-compoundable and triable by Magistrate of First class. A has committed no offence, though it may turn out that Z was acting in self-defence. Here, even if the child is killed by the fall, A has committed no offence.
It makes punishable all attempts to commit offences punishable with imprisonment and not only those punishable with death. Obstructing sale of property offered for sale by authority of public servant. To commit dacoity, there must be five or more offenders involved. The new clauses have come into force from October 9. A is guilty under this section.
A is in a house which is on fire, with Z, a child. A is guilty of the offence defined in this section. Delivery of coin as genuine, which, when first possessed, the deliverer did not know to be altered. In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi In Hindi Of Robbery and Dacoity 390. Section 390 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 defines Robbery. Explanation —The offender is said to be present if he is sufficiently near to put the other person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint. There is no element of force in theft There is the element of force, property is obtained by putting a person in fear of injury to that person, or to any other.
After initially working with local criminals active in northeast Delhi and the adjoining areas of Uttar Pradesh, Khan, a father of six, formed his own gang with his six brothers. A knowingly disobeys the order, and thereby causes danger of riot. A dishonestly disobeys the direction and employs the money in his own business. It was held that permanently taking away the property was not necessarily required, even temporary movement with a dishonest or malicious intention is enough and will amount to theft. Punishment—Imprisonment for life, or rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and fine—Cognizable—Non-bailable—Triable by Court of Session—Non-compoundable. A has committed the offence defined in this section. It can be committed on any woman, Married woman or widow.
State of Maharashtra, 1997 2 Crimes 47 Bom 395. It was not found sufficient to draw an inference as to performance of ceremonies essential for valid marriage. The property is taken without consent. Here, as A has a right to use the horse, he does not dishonestly misappropriate it. Sale of drug as a different drug or preparation. Under these exceptions no offence of defamation is proved.
Thus, A is guilty of robbery by theft of those valuables which he himself picks up , and of robbery by extortion of those valuables which Â handed over to him. Public servant negligently suffering such prisoner to escape. Making preparation to commit dacoity. A and B administer the poison according to the agreement with intent to murder Z. A has committed no offence. If by clerk or person employed by deceased: Punishment—Imprisonment for 7 years and fine—Non-Cognizable—Bailable—Triable by Magistrate of the first class—Non-compoundable. A common nuisance is not excused on the ground that it causes some convenience or advantage.