Let's take a look to the penalty. Everyone has different views and opinions on how it should be handled and whether they agree or disagree with it. What about the victim, who was killed, was it fair for them to die and suffer? Even though capital punishment has been abolished by more than a hundred countries across the world, it still remains a debatable issue. Death penalty really should not be abolished undoubtedly. Death penalty is wasting their own time for killing people. Moreover, it is cruel and unusual punishment.
The negative side, which my partner and I represent, feels that the death penalty should not be abolished and that today's system, which allows states to choose if they want to impose the death penalty, should continue to be used. Many people feel that this is a good way of bringing the families of the victims closure and making our streets safer to live on. He is prevented, not deterred, from so doing. It is one of the cruellest treatments, which no man or women deserves to experience, whatever crime has been committed. It is also used for attempting, authorizing or advising the killing of any officer, juror, or witness in cases involving a Continuing Criminal Enterprise, regardless of whether such killing actually occurs.
Also, the wrong person may be sentenced to death. The states that have the death. The real prisoners, who could be rehabilitated, will not have the chance because with more prisoners in rehab, they will not get the right amount of attention. The high costs of the death penalty are also another good reason to get it out of government's system. By altering… 2111 Words 9 Pages whether the death penalty should be abolished, has left politicians in the United States arguing back and forth.
Why fix something that is not broken. No one team can give impartial numbers since studies by both sides are bias. It does not help our nation at all but, it just shows that our government can be as harsh as the criminal. It has contributed to the ongoing problems of overcrowding and the rate of murder. We cannot justify killing someone if we are punctuating it by saying killing is wrong.
Each person, whether good or bad, whether God-fearing or, values his or her life above every possession he or she may have. We, the negative team, offer a plan that already has been proven, has limited negative aspects and innumerable benefits, and as a whole captures the ability to get the job done. For me the best way was the execution method because on the lethal injection method, the prisoner is put down to sleep before he dies, so he doesn't feel a thing. At the current time, approximately 97 countries have done away with the death penalty. The death penalty is not racially or gender bias, much to the contrary of what the affirmative team believes. Scanning is the first step of. Therefore, it may be statically shown that men are, by a 70:1 ratio, more likely to be on death row then are women.
While it may seem justifiable to take a life for a life, in the end no one really wins at all. The negative side, which my partner and I represent, feels that the death penalty should not be abolished and that today's system, which allows states to choose if they want to impose the death penalty, should continue to be used. Before we approach this question lets take a look at the history of the death penalty and other factors that could affect the answer to this question. There are pros and cons of the death penalty. Forcing the state to try criminals with the death penalty is fiscally irresponsible. If each executing is salvaging lives.
The death penalty is millions cheaper then life without parole in the long run, but when our numbers are compared to the affirmative's numbers no right or wrong conclusion can be reached. Over the years crimes that once would be given death penalty has increased so reintroducing the death penalty should be considered, benefits… 963 Words 4 Pages The death penalty, also called capital punishment, is the method some countries use to punish people who have committed violent crimes. While there is small grounds that the federal capital penalty system treats minorities below the belt. For the death penalty to work the offender must see it as a threat. Once they have been executed, they are gone for good. The audience for this essay is the opinion section of the Sunday New York Times. Capital punishment, Crime, Death row 812 Words 3 Pages societies have punished criminals by executing them, but today many countries have abolished the death penalty.
Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website! Many murders are committed under the influence of alcohol and drugs, some murderers might be mentally ill. If such a deterrent was found then criminals would have second thoughts of commiting the crime because they would think that they might get caught. When an individual faces Capital… of a person who has committed an unforgettable, heinous crime? Execution equals deterrent, which ultimately leads to prevention. We, the negative team, offer a plan that already has been proven, has limited negative aspects and innumerable benefits, and as a whole captures the ability to get the job done. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2002. The ultimate purpose of death penalty is to deter people from committing serious crimes.
Heinous and amoral crimes have become undeniably rife in our materialistic and worldly society, and a punishment of death would only appear as a very significant and large sacrifice to take for granted before committing the most heinous and conscienceless acts. If a man took the life of another man, society took the life of the murderer. It is an important issue since it concerns one of the most fundamental human rights, which is the right to live. Crime will always be a part of the world and there will be better ways to handle it. Consequently, the issue of abolishing death penalty has been discussed recently.