But how fair are the different systems of voting, of which there are over three hundred, either actually in existence or potentially available. The reason for this is to simply receive more credibility from my audience that I have looked at all sides of this and from all of this information was able to draw my own conclusion. However, much water has flown since the 2013 elections, but little, if any, has been done to facilitate overseas Pakistani for casting their vote. Indian Elections, the Largest Event in the World The independence of India came with the sorrow of partition of the country. The voting process, although it seems easy and straightforward, can be very complicated. Forces within a school comprise students, teachers, administrators, non certified personnel, parents, district leaders, and community members. The government of India is quasi-judicial; theofficials are elected at the federal, state and local levels.
Because of lack of political consensus a wide package of reforms has been pending. In the presidential race of 1888 between Grover Cleveland and Benjamin Harrison, Cleveland won the public by over 100,000 ballots, but when broken down into Electoral College ballots, Harrison won by a instead big border. The elections held at regular intervals, that is, after every five years forms a part of our democratic structure. Moreover, reducing the voting age to 18 means that even the school and college students are taking part in elections. The legislative changes effected in 1956 and 1974 in relation to election expenses have further aggravated the situation. But another branch of government, the executive branch, needed a sole president and the framers had to decide how to choose this president.
However, such a plan and change would require a constitutional amendment. The extraordinary complexity of the. In the constitutional convention the drafters had to decide how much power they would entrust with the people of the United States, and how much should be controlled by representatives. One of the main problems with this is that not everyone wants the same thing. The political or the candidates are forced to indulge in corruption and corruption practices because of the huge financial requirements of an Indian election. It also means that the government will not fall prematurely, thus sparring Canadians the agonies of. Since then there have been eleven general elections to the Lok Sabha and a number of elections to the Legislative Assemblies of the State.
Why did the founding fathers create the Electoral College. Originally in the Constitution, the electors were to vote for the two most qualified persons without specification of presidential or vice-presidential candidates. These constitutional provisions enable the completion of tasks in an accurate and efficient way Wei, 2014. Elections in India take place every five years by universal adult suffrage. Hence, these expenditure ceilings need to be staggered and customized after factoring the real expenditure requirements of the different constituencies.
However, as times moved on, the right for every adult man and woman to vote was given. When the founding fathers sat down at the table to discuss the process of the national election of the highest office of the land they had a lot of things on their minds. The elimination of non-serious candidates by further increasing the security deposits is another point which deserves serious consideration. In State B, 1 individual ballots for Joe and 9 people vote for Jack. It is very essential that some urgent and effective steps are taken to check the role of money power in elections.
It promotes two-party system of governance. Many of us are often found cursing the government of the day for doing a something but we ourselves have been found wanting in shouldering the responsibility bestowed on us by the Constitution of India, i. For two months my family and I watched my grandmother deteriorate in her hospital bed. You take your ballot into the box believing, as most people do, that your vote will be counted along with the rest of the population. Already, three provinces have attempted to vote on electoral reform; however, the vote did not pass in any of them. No law or reform, however, judiciously enacted will be fruitful and effective unless there is a change of hearts and attitudes of the political leaders and parties. It would also attract more good and honest people who are now averse to contesting elections in such a corrupt and foul political atmosphere.
These amendments have made the law relating to election expenses farcical. Even though such a stipulation could bar a huge percentage of our population from participating in electoral politics, a time has definitely come to start debating the advisability of such a qualification. The Popular Vote system is better than the electoral college, because it gives the American… 1638 Words 7 Pages The need for Electoral Reform in Canada Through a Mixed Electoral System Altering the electoral system would undoubtedly benefit Canada in numerous ways through the use of a mixed electoral system using proportional representation and alternative voting. Every American citizen over the age of 18 has a right to cast a vote in the presidential election. These areas are called electoral constituencies. Yet in other situations it does not matter because people are only voting for one of two options and results are therefore conclusive and can only go one way or the other.
Therefore journeys to non-bordering states were an extremely rare occurrence. For instance, booth capturing was one of the ways political parties had been known to use in order to wrench a false mandate from a hostile electorate by force. Criminalisation of politics and influence of money power are the two main evils to be tackled immediately to make elections fairly free and fair. Booth capturing is an offence now and is punishable with up to two years imprisonment and fine. Those in support of the abolishment of the Electoral College argue that direct election would give equal voting rights and weigh all the states equally. Compulsory voting has also been recommended by many given the apathy of substantive number of voters to come out to vote. Before independence elections were held on the basis of limited electorate in constituencies formed chiefly on communal basis.
They also point out that it is wrong to say that proportional representation leads to economic, political and social collapse. If there are more than two campaigners who received less popular ballots than the top two, they should be stricken from the Electoral College ballot. Regretfully, the overuse phrases have become mantras and in the process the real definitions of the words or how they are supposed to be implemented is convoluted. When voters casts their ballots, they are actually voting for the presidential electors. In the 2000 election, Al Gore captured the majority of votes, but George Bush won. Within this context, there are those parties in the United States who have this strong desire to change the structure of the federal government as a means of abolishing a long-held tradition of electoral vote. The question that should be asked by every citizen as they participate in the vote next year is if the Electoral College enables the wishes of the people to be truly represented.