He uses his ridiculous sarcasm of killing, eating, and selling children not as a serious proposal, but to show how bad it is for the poor people. Yes, ladies and gentleman, Jack is stating one of the benefits of eating babies is we can have more bacon. He has created a disgustingly superior character. His compassion for the misery of the Irish people is a severe one, and he includes a critique of their incompetence in dealing with their own problems. The person suggests eating the flesh of fourteen-year-old children in addition to infants, which would reduce a child-bearing Irish generation as well.
At long last, the Proposer finally unveils his own plan. He later changes to scary tone as he progresses to give his personal opinions about these children. The serious point in the passage as written is that people often set themselves up as moral judges, nosing into other people's dirty laundry, which means getting their own noses dirty, not unlike what happens to a broom when it is used to sweep away the dust. He defends his friend, nevertheless, by saying that the friend learned of this practice in Asia among certain savage peoples. It is meant to highlight the serious problems of the country and push readers to despise the speaker and the social context from which that speaker comes. The word useless here is very important. Sixth, it will enhance the institution of marriage as women take better care of their infants so that they may be sold, and men will take better care of their wives so that their wives can make more babies to sell.
Swift is more than insinuating the outrageous rents they charge Irish residents are to blame for the problem. The Proposer acknowledges that while his plan will take care of all the impoverished children, it fails to account for all the many aging, sick, disabled, and starving adults in Ireland. This dehumanizes the children to be like animals. He constantly likens beggers to animals, even comparing children to? That they are so wrapped up in their own little worlds they are not willing to see another view. These people do nothing but live off of the government.
After detailing in the previous paragraph the cost associated with child rearing Jack makes the point that selling children into slavery is not an option because it is not cost-effective. This is a horrific behavior that is being opposed everywhere in this world. However, while on the surface the speaker argues for the reader to agree with his point, the reader is supposed to be horrified by his proposal and reject it. Jack is animalizing the children making them into a commodity. He wrote A Modest Proposal in order to bring the attention to the problems the poor Irish were facing because of the famine.
This proposal included the selling, skinning and buying of babies at the age of one. Throughout the piece Swift constantly seeks to jusify his proposal by mentioning the suggestions he has received from his influential friends in foreign countries. For this kind of commodity will not bear exportation, and flesh being of too tender a consistence, to admit a long continuance in salt. And that is their point. By speaking through a character Swift was able to sound like his opposition. How can people get jobs if there are no jobs to be had? Their intentions might indeed be very noble but instead their words and ideas come across as cold and callous.
On top of that, we get the feeling that Jack feels a poor woman is only good for working and breeding. He convinces his readers that his proposal can solve the prevalent issue during his time. All the money stays in Ireland. To really investigate the gutter, one must put part of oneself in the gutter. Swift is criticizing the lack of manufacturing in Ireland. In paragraph 15, Jack goes even farther than referring to the children as carcasses. Often, blandly protesting grievances or concerns can fall upon deaf ears and change can be slow or non-existent.
Though not necessarily for the better. Though the Proposer refuses to entertain the many other plans that have circulated among politicians, he proceeds to list them anyway. How can you be so complacent? On one occasion he Johnathan Swift wrote Modest Proposal with the idea to better humanity. The writer has dismissed this idea, though, because the flesh of fourteen-year-old boys is too lean, and fourteen-year-old girls might soon become breeders of infants themselves. Whether we agree or disagree with this quote is highly debatable and depends on our individual opinion of satire in general. And moms would be so much kinder to their children because they only have them for a year. Now, if there was ever a reason to eat babies this would be it.
Many mistake it for only being used as a mean to make mockery and turn a serious situation into a humorous one. He further clarifies that in certain occasion, the body parts will be on demand. I believed that Swift added cannibalizing children to the subject matter to give his proposal a more profound and eye-opening effect, but my readings further piqued my interests on the topic. We have horror movies with this plot. Catholics are extremely against abortion and birth control of any kind. So, women can now be compared to breeding horses. Now that I have further studies and understand the piece I like it.
Swift exaggerates this concept by using numerical specifics, such as the mass and weight required of the infants, the portion of the child population that will be used to contribute to family finances, the monetary worth and financial benefits of selling infant flesh, and more. Okay, what is the most offensive thing that I can have this asshole propose that idiots cannot possibly take seriously? Swift, a priest at St. He is submitting a harsh critique of the wealthy who are not willing to give an inch to help out their fellow man. He further exaggerates by saying that the children will be roasted like pigs. The writer calculates the number of infants born in Ireland and asks what should be done with them. Swift then talks about how there are very many of these poor people in Ireland and how they are not able to be part of the middle or working class.
Also, naming population decrease as the one potential objection to his proposal, Swift heightens the irony of an already ironic piece. While Swift himself was an astute economic thinker, he often expressed contempt for the application of supposedly scientific management ideas to humanitarian concerns. If you treat people as worthless, count them as worthless, and speak about them as worthless someone, somewhere is going to think these people are actually worthless. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2003. That is exactly what this proposal does.